Who is better, Button or Antonelli?
Jenson Button leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.8 for Andrea Kimi Antonelli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jenson Button and Andrea Kimi Antonelli level at 76.8. Jenson Button leads on Longevity. Andrea Kimi Antonelli leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Button wins: Longevity
Antonelli wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jenson-button-vs-kimi-antonelli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Button leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Button | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 🇮🇹 Antonelli | 0 | 0 | 55 | 122 | 383 | 468 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ButtonRetired | AntonelliActive |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | 15 | — |
| Podiums | 50 | — |
| Pole positions | 8 | — |
| Race starts | 306 | — |
| Fastest laps | 8 | 1 |
| Formula Regional titles | — | 2 |
| Formula One podiums | — | 2 |
| Youngest pole position age | — | 18 |
| Grand prix starts | — | 45 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Jenson Button leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.8 for Andrea Kimi Antonelli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Antonelli scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Button leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Button: 76.8, Antonelli: 76.8.
Make your case for Button vs Antonelli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.