Who is better, Coney or Constantine?
Jeremy Coney leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Learie Constantine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jeremy Coney and Learie Constantine level at 82.2. Jeremy Coney leads on Statistics, Longevity, Honours. Learie Constantine leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Coney wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Constantine wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jeremy-coney-vs-learie-constantine
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Coney leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Coney | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
| 🇹🇹 Constantine | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 277 | 623 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConeyRetired | ConstantineRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 2,668 | — |
| Test centuries | 3 | — |
| Test wickets | 27 | 58 |
| Tests as captain | 15 | — |
| Series wins as captain in Australia | 1 | — |
| First-class wickets | — | 439 |
| First-class runs | — | 4,475 |
| Tests played | — | 18 |
| League seasons | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Jeremy Coney leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Learie Constantine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Constantine scores higher on peak, dominance. Coney leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coney: 82.2, Constantine: 82.2.
Make your case for Coney vs Constantine. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.