Who is better, Coney or Chapman?
Jeremy Coney leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Percy Chapman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Coney vs Chapman
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jeremy Coney and Percy Chapman level at 82.2. Jeremy Coney leads on Statistics, Longevity. Percy Chapman leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConeyWinner
82.2Coney wins: Longevity, Statistics
Chapman
82.2Chapman wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/jeremy-coney-vs-percy-chapman
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney
82.2
Coney leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jeremy Coney
2. Percy Chapman
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Percy Chapman5 years played · career day 1,826295 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney5 years played · career day 1,825273 runs
-7.5% vs Chapman at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Coney | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
| 🇬🇧 Chapman | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 222 | 645 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Coney82.2
Chapman82.2
FAQ
Where does Chapman beat Coney?
Chapman scores higher on dominance, honours. Coney leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Coney vs Chapman score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coney: 82.2, Chapman: 82.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Coney vs Chapman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.