Who is better, Coney or Raja?
Jeremy Coney leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.1 for Wasim Raja — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Coney vs Raja
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jeremy Coney above Wasim Raja: 82.2 vs 82.1. Jeremy Coney leads on Honours. Wasim Raja leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConeyWinner
82.2Coney wins: Honours
Raja
82.1Raja wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/jeremy-coney-vs-wasim-raja
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney
82.2
Coney leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jeremy Coney
2. Wasim Raja
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney5 years played · career day 1,825273 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Wasim Raja5 years played · career day 2,556170 runs
-37.7% vs Coney at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Coney | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
| 🇵🇰 Raja | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 266 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Coney82.2
Raja82.1
FAQ
Where does Raja beat Coney?
Raja scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Coney leads on honours.
How is the Coney vs Raja score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coney: 82.2, Raja: 82.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Coney vs Raja. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.