Who is better, Taylor or Judah?
Jermain Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Zab Judah — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Taylor vs Judah
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jermain Taylor above Zab Judah: 82.8 vs 82.7. Jermain Taylor leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Zab Judah leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TaylorWinner
82.8Taylor wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Judah
82.7Judah wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/jermain-taylor-vs-zab-judah
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jermain Taylor
82.8
Taylor leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jermain Taylor
2. Zab Judah
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Zab Judah5 years played · career day 1,82623 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jermain Taylor5 years played · career day 1,82521 title wins
-8.7% vs Judah at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 29 |
| 🇺🇸 Judah | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 20 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Taylor82.8
Judah82.7
FAQ
Where does Judah beat Taylor?
Judah scores higher on longevity. Taylor leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Taylor vs Judah score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Taylor: 82.8, Judah: 82.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Taylor vs Judah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.