Who is better, Charlo or Jackson?
Jermell Charlo leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.5 for Peter Jackson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Charlo vs Jackson
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jermell Charlo above Peter Jackson: 85.7 vs 85.5. Jermell Charlo leads on Honours. Peter Jackson leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CharloWinner
85.7Charlo wins: Honours
Jackson
85.5Jackson wins: Dominance, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/jermell-charlo-vs-peter-jackson-boxer
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jermell Charlo
85.7
Charlo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jermell Charlo
2. Peter Jackson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Peter Jackson5 years played · career day 2,19033 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jermell Charlo5 years played · career day 1,82520 title wins
-39.4% vs Jackson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Charlo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 20 | 29 |
| 🇦🇺 Jackson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 51 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Charlo85.7
Jackson85.5
FAQ
Where does Jackson beat Charlo?
Jackson scores higher on dominance, longevity. Charlo leads on honours.
How is the Charlo vs Jackson score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Charlo: 85.7, Jackson: 85.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Charlo vs Jackson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.