Who is better, Rice or Washington?
Jerry Rice leads with a GOAT score of 94.9 against 17.9 for Parker Washington — a gap of 77.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jerry Rice above Parker Washington: 94.9 vs 17.9. Jerry Rice leads on Longevity, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rice wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Washington wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jerry-rice-vs-ros-parker-washington
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rice leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Washington — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 23
No verified birth date for Washington — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 23, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | RiceRetired | WashingtonActive · Jacksonville Jaguars |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl rings | 3 | — |
| Super Bowl MVP | 1 | — |
| Receiving yards | 22,895 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 197 | — |
| Receptions | 1,549 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 13 | — |
| NFL games | — | 42 |
| NFL yards | — | 1,369 |
| Number | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 96 | 18 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 22.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 16 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 14 |
| Statistics w15% | 99 | 19.3 |
Jerry Rice leads with a GOAT score of 94.9 against 17.9 for Parker Washington — a gap of 77.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Washington does not lead any of the five categories; Rice is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rice: 94.9, Washington: 17.9.
Make your case for Rice vs Washington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.