Who is better, Burkett or Appling?
Luke Appling leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Jesse Burkett — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Luke Appling above Jesse Burkett: 87.8 vs 87.7. Luke Appling leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jesse Burkett leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Appling wins: Longevity, Statistics
Burkett wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jesse-burkett-vs-luke-appling
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Appling leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Burkett | 0 | 0 | 0.309 | 0.578 | 1.559 | 3.098 |
| 🇺🇸 Appling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.232 | 1.131 | 2.446 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Luke Appling leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Jesse Burkett — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Burkett scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Appling leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burkett: 87.7, Appling: 87.8.
Make your case for Burkett vs Appling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.