Who is better, Owens or Powell?
Mike Powell leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.3 for Jesse Owens — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mike Powell above Jesse Owens: 86.6 vs 86.3. Mike Powell leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jesse Owens leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Powell wins: Longevity, Statistics
Owens wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jesse-owens-vs-mike-powell-lj
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Powell leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Owens | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.3 | 30.7 | 61.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Powell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OwensRetired | PowellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| World records set | 6 | — |
| NCAA titles | 8 | — |
| Long jump world record years | 25 | — |
| 100 m personal best | 10.2 | — |
| Long jump best (m) | 8.13 | — |
| World record in metres | — | 8.95 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Years the world record has stood | — | 34 |
| US national titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Mike Powell leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.3 for Jesse Owens — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Owens scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Powell leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Owens: 86.3, Powell: 86.6.
Make your case for Owens vs Powell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.