Who is better, Ashwood or Frölander?
Lars Frölander leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.0 for Jessica Ashwood — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lars Frölander above Jessica Ashwood: 80.2 vs 80.0. Lars Frölander leads on Longevity. Jessica Ashwood leads on Statistics, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Frölander wins: Longevity
Ashwood wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jessica-ashwood-vs-lars-frolander
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Frölander leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Ashwood | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 558 |
| 🇸🇪 Frölander | 0 | 0 | 56 | 118 | 264 | 700 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AshwoodRetired | FrölanderRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Australian titles | 5 | — |
| Olympic finals | 2 | — |
| Pan Pacific medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 5 |
| Short course world titles | — | 6 |
| European Championship golds | — | 7 |
| Swedish records set | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Lars Frölander leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.0 for Jessica Ashwood — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ashwood scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Frölander leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ashwood: 80.0, Frölander: 80.2.
Make your case for Ashwood vs Frölander. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.