Who is better, Beard or Stecher?
Jessica Beard leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Renate Stecher — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jessica Beard and Renate Stecher level at 83.6. Jessica Beard leads on Longevity, Statistics. Renate Stecher leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beard wins: Longevity, Statistics
Stecher wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jessica-beard-vs-renate-stecher
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beard leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Beard | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 317 | 660 |
| 🇩🇪 Stecher | 0 | 0 | 62 | 132 | 392 | 742 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeardRetired | StecherRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 2 | — |
| World relay titles | 1 | — |
| NCAA titles | 4 | — |
| Personal best (s) | 50.21 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 6 |
| European Championship golds | — | 3 |
| World records set | — | 4 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Jessica Beard leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Renate Stecher — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stecher scores higher on peak, dominance. Beard leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beard: 83.6, Stecher: 83.6.
Make your case for Beard vs Stecher. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.