Who is better, Ennis-Hill or Noguchi?
Jessica Ennis-Hill leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Mizuki Noguchi — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jessica Ennis-Hill and Mizuki Noguchi level at 85.0. Jessica Ennis-Hill leads on Honours. Mizuki Noguchi leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ennis-Hill wins: Honours
Noguchi wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jessica-ennis-hill-vs-mizuki-noguchi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ennis-Hill leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Ennis-Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19,717 | 40,285 |
| 🇯🇵 Noguchi | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 316 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Ennis-HillRetired | NoguchiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| European golds | 1 | — |
| Best score (points) | 6,955 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Marathon personal best in seconds | — | 7,740 |
| Major marathon wins | — | 3 |
| Asian records set | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Jessica Ennis-Hill leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Mizuki Noguchi — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Noguchi scores higher on peak, longevity. Ennis-Hill leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ennis-Hill: 85.0, Noguchi: 85.0.
Make your case for Ennis-Hill vs Noguchi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.