Who is better, Houara or Eriksson?
Jessica Houara leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Magdalena Eriksson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jessica Houara and Magdalena Eriksson level at 80.1. Jessica Houara leads on Statistics, Longevity. Magdalena Eriksson leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Houara wins: Longevity, Statistics
Eriksson wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jessica-houara-v-vs-magdalena-eriksson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Houara leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Houara | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 626 |
| 🇸🇪 Eriksson | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 89 | 179 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HouaraRetired | ErikssonActive |
|---|---|---|
| France caps | 71 | — |
| French cups | 1 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Champions League finals | 2 | — |
| Career appearances | 300 | — |
| Women's Super League titles | — | 4 |
| FA Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Sweden caps | — | 100 |
| World Cup bronze medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 76 |
Jessica Houara leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Magdalena Eriksson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Eriksson scores higher on dominance, honours. Houara leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Houara: 80.1, Eriksson: 80.1.
Make your case for Houara vs Eriksson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.