Who is better, Scott or Gyökeres?
Jill Scott leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jill Scott and Viktor Gyökeres level at 85.5. Jill Scott leads on Longevity, Honours. Viktor Gyökeres leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Scott wins: Longevity, Honours
Gyökeres wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jill-scott-v-vs-viktor-gyokeres-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Scott leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Scott | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 304 | 628 |
| 🇸🇪 Gyökeres | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 235 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ScottRetired | GyökeresActive · Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
| England caps | 161 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Women's FA Cup titles | 3 | — |
| League titles | 2 | — |
| Major tournaments | 8 | — |
| European Golden Shoe awards | — | 1 |
| Primeira Liga titles | — | 2 |
| Portuguese league goals | — | 68 |
| Sweden goals | — | 20 |
| Career goals | — | 200 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Jill Scott leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gyökeres scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Scott leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Scott: 85.5, Gyökeres: 85.5.
Make your case for Scott vs Gyökeres. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.