Who is better, Bunning or Dandridge?
Jim Bunning leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.3 for Ray Dandridge — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Bunning above Ray Dandridge: 81.6 vs 81.3. Jim Bunning leads on Honours, Statistics. Ray Dandridge leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bunning wins: Honours, Statistics
Dandridge wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-bunning-vs-ray-dandridge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bunning leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Bunning | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 306 | 650 |
| 🇺🇸 Dandridge | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 306 | 650 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BunningRetired | DandridgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 224 | — |
| Career strikeouts | 2,855 | — |
| Perfect games | 1 | — |
| No-hitters | 2 | — |
| All-Star selections | 9 | — |
| Negro League All-Star selections | — | 4 |
| Mexican League titles | — | 3 |
| Career batting average | — | 0.319 |
| Minor League MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Jim Bunning leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.3 for Ray Dandridge — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dandridge scores higher on longevity. Bunning leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bunning: 81.6, Dandridge: 81.3.
Make your case for Bunning vs Dandridge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.