Who is better, Burke or Childs?
Jim Burke leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 77.8 for John Childs — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Burke above John Childs: 78.3 vs 77.8. Jim Burke leads on Dominance, Honours. John Childs leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burke wins: Dominance, Honours
Childs wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-burke-vs-john-childs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burke leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Burke | 0 | 0 | 40 | 86 | 198 | 586 |
| 🇬🇧 Childs | 0 | 0 | 20 | 55 | 235 | 505 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Jim Burke leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 77.8 for John Childs — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Childs scores higher on statistics, longevity. Burke leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burke: 78.3, Childs: 77.8.
Make your case for Burke vs Childs. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.