GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Laker vs Devine

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LakerWinner
89.6

Laker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Devine
89.6

Devine wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jim-laker-vs-sophie-devine

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jim Laker
89.6

Laker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Took 19 wickets in one Test at Old Trafford in 1956, a record that still stands.

1. Jim Laker
89.6
2. Sophie Devine
89.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇳🇿 Sophie Devine5 years played · career day 2,190136 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jim Laker5 years played · career day 2,55686 runs
-36.8% vs Devine at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Laker000042146
🇳🇿 Devine00018100268

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLakerRetiredDevineActive
Wickets in the 1956 Old Trafford Test19
Test wickets193
Test bowling average21.24
First-class wickets1,944
Ashes series won4
T20 World Cup titles1
Fastest women's T20I century (balls)36
T20I runs3,500
ODI runs4,000
International seasons19
Dominance w25%8886
Peak w20%10096
Longevity w20%8288
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%9694

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Laker89.6
Devine89.6
The people
Laker
Devine

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Laker vs Devine. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →