Who is better, Laker or Devine?
Jim Laker leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.6 for Sophie Devine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jim Laker and Sophie Devine level at 89.6. Jim Laker leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Sophie Devine leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Laker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Devine wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-laker-vs-sophie-devine
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Laker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Laker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 146 |
| 🇳🇿 Devine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 100 | 268 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LakerRetired | DevineActive |
|---|---|---|
| Wickets in the 1956 Old Trafford Test | 19 | — |
| Test wickets | 193 | — |
| Test bowling average | 21.24 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,944 | — |
| Ashes series won | 4 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Fastest women's T20I century (balls) | — | 36 |
| T20I runs | — | 3,500 |
| ODI runs | — | 4,000 |
| International seasons | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Jim Laker leads with a GOAT score of 89.6 against 89.6 for Sophie Devine — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Devine scores higher on honours, longevity. Laker leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Laker: 89.6, Devine: 89.6.
Make your case for Laker vs Devine. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.