Who is better, Otto or Brown?
Jim Otto leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.3 for Tim Brown — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jim Otto and Tim Brown level at 88.3. Jim Otto leads on Honours, Dominance. Tim Brown leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Otto wins: Dominance, Honours
Brown wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-otto-vs-tim-brown
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Otto leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Otto | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 260 | 696 |
| 🇺🇸 Brown | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 214 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OttoRetired | BrownRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-league selections | 12 | — |
| Consecutive games played | 210 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 12 | 9 |
| AFL titles | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | — |
| Receptions | — | 1,094 |
| Receiving yards | — | 14,934 |
| Receiving touchdowns | — | 100 |
| Consecutive 1,000-yard seasons | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Jim Otto leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.3 for Tim Brown — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brown scores higher on statistics, longevity. Otto leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Otto: 88.3, Brown: 88.3.
Make your case for Otto vs Brown. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.