Who is better, Parker or Dent?
Jim Parker leads with a GOAT score of 88.9 against 88.9 for Richard Dent — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Parker vs Dent
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jim Parker and Richard Dent level at 88.9. Jim Parker leads on Dominance, Honours. Richard Dent leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ParkerWinner
88.9Parker wins: Dominance, Honours
Dent
88.9Dent wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/jim-parker-vs-richard-dent
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jim Parker
88.9
Parker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jim Parker
2. Richard Dent
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Richard Dent5 seasons played · career day 1,825386 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jim Parker5 seasons played · career day 1,825359 touchdowns
-7.0% vs Dent at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Parker | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 359 | 685 |
| 🇺🇸 Dent | 0 | 0 | 50 | 116 | 386 | 701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Parker88.9
Dent88.9
FAQ
Where does Dent beat Parker?
Dent scores higher on statistics, longevity. Parker leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Parker vs Dent score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 88.9, Dent: 88.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Parker vs Dent. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.