Who is better, Rathmann or Vandoorne?
Stoffel Vandoorne leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.1 for Jim Rathmann — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Stoffel Vandoorne above Jim Rathmann: 79.6 vs 79.1. Stoffel Vandoorne leads on Honours, Dominance. Jim Rathmann leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Vandoorne wins: Dominance, Honours
Rathmann wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-rathmann-vs-stoffel-vandoorne
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vandoorne leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Rathmann | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 |
| 🇧🇪 Vandoorne | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 86 | 627 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RathmannRetired | VandoorneActive |
|---|---|---|
| Indianapolis 500 wins | 1 | — |
| Indianapolis 500 runner-up finishes | 3 | — |
| Indy 500 starts | 14 | — |
| Career championship points | 30 | — |
| Career span in years | 15 | — |
| Formula E titles | — | 1 |
| Formula E wins | — | 5 |
| Formula 1 starts | — | 41 |
| GP2 titles | — | 1 |
| Formula E podiums | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Stoffel Vandoorne leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.1 for Jim Rathmann — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rathmann scores higher on peak, longevity. Vandoorne leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rathmann: 79.1, Vandoorne: 79.6.
Make your case for Rathmann vs Vandoorne. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.