Who is better, Ringo or Buoniconti?
Jim Ringo leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 88.5 for Nick Buoniconti — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jim Ringo and Nick Buoniconti level at 88.5. Jim Ringo leads on Longevity. Nick Buoniconti leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ringo wins: Longevity
Buoniconti wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-ringo-vs-nick-buoniconti
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ringo leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ringo | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 307 | 653 |
| 🇺🇸 Buoniconti | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RingoRetired | BuonicontiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 10 | — |
| Consecutive games played | 182 | — |
| NFL titles | 2 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 7 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | 15 |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 2 |
| All-star selections | — | 8 |
| Career interceptions | — | 32 |
| Perfect seasons | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Jim Ringo leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 88.5 for Nick Buoniconti — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Buoniconti scores higher on peak. Ringo leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ringo: 88.5, Buoniconti: 88.5.
Make your case for Ringo vs Buoniconti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.