Who is better, Conzelman or Warner?
Jimmy Conzelman leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.8 for Kurt Warner — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Conzelman vs Warner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jimmy Conzelman above Kurt Warner: 78.9 vs 78.8. Jimmy Conzelman leads on Longevity. Kurt Warner leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConzelmanWinner
78.9Conzelman wins: Longevity
Warner
78.8Warner wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/jimmy-conzelman-vs-kurt-warner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jimmy Conzelman
78.9
Conzelman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jimmy Conzelman
2. Kurt Warner
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Kurt Warner5 seasons played · career day 2,19012,055 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jimmy Conzelman5 seasons played · career day 1,826368 touchdowns
-96.9% vs Warner at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Conzelman | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 276 | 642 |
| 🇺🇸 Warner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,353 | 12,055 | 18,240 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConzelmanRetired | WarnerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL titles as player | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Career touchdowns | 20 | — |
| Teams played for | 5 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 2 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| League MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Passing yards | — | 32,344 |
| Career passer rating | — | 93.7 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Conzelman78.9
Warner78.8
FAQ
Where does Warner beat Conzelman?
Warner scores higher on peak, statistics. Conzelman leads on longevity.
How is the Conzelman vs Warner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conzelman: 78.9, Warner: 78.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Conzelman vs Warner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.