GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cook vs Wolvaardt

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CookWinner
87.0

Cook wins: Longevity, Statistics

Wolvaardt
86.8

Wolvaardt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jimmy-cook-vs-laura-wolvaardt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Jimmy Cook
87.0

Cook leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 21,143 first-class runs and a century on one-day international debut.

1. Jimmy Cook
87.0
2. Laura Wolvaardt
86.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇿🇦 Jimmy Cook5 years played · career day 1,826258 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Laura Wolvaardt5 years played · career day 1,826226 runs
-12.4% vs Cook at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇿🇦 Cook004593200525
🇿🇦 Wolvaardt003272170472

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCookRetiredWolvaardtActive
First-class runs21,143
First-class centuries64
Runs in the 1991 county season2,755
Tests played3
Seasons played22
World Cup finals reached3
ODI runs4,000
ODI centuries8
ODI average46
Career best ODI ranking2
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%9078
Honours w20%7684
Statistics w15%9694

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Cook87.0
Wolvaardt86.8
The people
Cook
Wolvaardt

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cook vs Wolvaardt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →