Who is better, Jimpphat or Kramer?
Kirill "Jimpphat" Marushchenko leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Kramer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kirill "Jimpphat" Marushchenko above Kramer: 77.4 vs 77.3. Kirill "Jimpphat" Marushchenko leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Kramer leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jimpphat wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Kramer wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jimpphat-vs-kramer-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jimpphat leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 Jimpphat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.06 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| 🇰🇷 Kramer | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 302 | 584 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JimpphatActive | KramerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big events won | 4 | — |
| Top-20 player rankings | 1 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 2 | — |
| Career rating | 1.11 | — |
| MVP medals | 1 | — |
| Worlds appearances | — | 2 |
| LPL playoff runs | — | 4 |
| LCK seasons | — | 4 |
| Career seasons | — | 9 |
| Career playoff series | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 78 |
Kirill "Jimpphat" Marushchenko leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Kramer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kramer scores higher on longevity. Jimpphat leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jimpphat: 77.4, Kramer: 77.3.
Make your case for Jimpphat vs Kramer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.