Who is better, Siffert or de Vries?
Nyck de Vries leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 75.4 for Jo Siffert — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Siffert vs de Vries
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nyck de Vries above Jo Siffert: 76.2 vs 75.4. Nyck de Vries leads on Honours, Peak. Jo Siffert leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
de VriesWinner
76.2de Vries wins: Peak, Honours
Siffert
75.4Siffert wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/jo-siffert-vs-nyck-de-vries
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇱 Nyck de Vries
76.2
de Vries leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Nyck de Vries
2. Jo Siffert
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇱 Nyck de Vries5 seasons played · career day 1,82517 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇭 Jo Siffert5 seasons played · career day 1,8250 race wins
-100.0% vs de Vries at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇭 Siffert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 🇳🇱 de Vries | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
de Vries76.2
Siffert75.4
FAQ
Where does Siffert beat de Vries?
Siffert scores higher on longevity. de Vries leads on peak, honours.
How is the Siffert vs de Vries score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Siffert: 75.4, de Vries: 76.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Siffert vs de Vries. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.