Who is better, Baptiste or Makau?
Joan Baptiste leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Patrick Makau — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joan Baptiste above Patrick Makau: 78.7 vs 78.6. Joan Baptiste leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Patrick Makau leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baptiste wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Makau wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/joan-baptiste-vs-patrick-makau
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baptiste leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Baptiste | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 353 | 603 |
| 🇰🇪 Makau | 0 | 0 | 72 | 154 | 338 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaptisteRetired | MakauRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| British titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| Relay finals | 4 | — |
| World record marathon | — | 2.034 |
| Berlin Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Frankfurt Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Sub 2:05 marathons | — | 4 |
| Half marathon best | — | 58.52 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Joan Baptiste leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Patrick Makau — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Makau scores higher on peak, dominance. Baptiste leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baptiste: 78.7, Makau: 78.6.
Make your case for Baptiste vs Makau. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.