Who is better, Benoit Samuelson or Coe?
Joan Benoit Samuelson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sebastian Coe — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Joan Benoit Samuelson and Sebastian Coe level at 87.5. Joan Benoit Samuelson leads on Longevity. Sebastian Coe leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Benoit Samuelson wins: Longevity
Coe wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/joan-benoit-samuelson-vs-sebastian-coe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Benoit Samuelson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Benoit Samuelson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 18 |
| 🇬🇧 Coe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101.73 | 512.26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Benoit SamuelsonActive | CoeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | 2 |
| Boston Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Chicago Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| World records | 1 | 12 |
| Marathon best (min) | 141.52 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| 800 m best (s) | — | 101.73 |
| 1500 m best (s) | — | 212.18 |
| European golds | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Joan Benoit Samuelson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sebastian Coe — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Coe scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Benoit Samuelson leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Benoit Samuelson: 87.5, Coe: 87.5.
Make your case for Benoit Samuelson vs Coe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.