Who is better, Benoit Samuelson or Dibaba?
Joan Benoit Samuelson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Tirunesh Dibaba — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Joan Benoit Samuelson and Tirunesh Dibaba level at 87.5. Joan Benoit Samuelson leads on Peak. Tirunesh Dibaba leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Benoit Samuelson wins: Peak
Dibaba wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/joan-benoit-samuelson-vs-tirunesh-dibaba
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Benoit Samuelson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Benoit Samuelson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 18 |
| 🇪🇹 Dibaba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,620.1 | 6,082.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Benoit SamuelsonActive | DibabaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | 3 |
| Boston Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Chicago Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| World records | 1 | 1 |
| Marathon best (min) | 141.52 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| World cross-country golds | — | 4 |
| 5000 m best (s) | — | 862.6 |
| 10,000 m best (s) | — | 1,782.76 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteJoan Benoit Samuelson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Tirunesh Dibaba — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dibaba scores higher on honours. Benoit Samuelson leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Benoit Samuelson: 87.5, Dibaba: 87.5.
Make your case for Benoit Samuelson vs Dibaba. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.