Who is better, Joaquín or Ferdinand?
Joaquín Sánchez leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Rio Ferdinand — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joaquín Sánchez above Rio Ferdinand: 79.7 vs 79.6. Joaquín Sánchez leads on Longevity, Statistics. Rio Ferdinand leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Joaquín wins: Longevity, Statistics
Ferdinand wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/joaquin-sanchez-vs-rio-ferdinand
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Joaquín leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Joaquín | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 145 | 283 |
| 🏴 Ferdinand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 97 | 253 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JoaquínRetired | FerdinandRetired |
|---|---|---|
| La Liga appearances | 622 | — |
| Copa del Rey titles | 2 | — |
| Spain caps | 51 | — |
| Career club goals | 105 | — |
| Seasons in La Liga | 22 | — |
| Premier League titles | — | 6 |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Appearances | — | 673 |
| England caps | — | 81 |
| League Cups | — | 3 |
| Clean sheets | — | 250 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 76 |
Joaquín Sánchez leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Rio Ferdinand — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ferdinand scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Joaquín leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Joaquín: 79.7, Ferdinand: 79.6.
Make your case for Joaquín vs Ferdinand. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.