GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cameron vs Barnett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently ranks Jock Cameron above Kim Barnett: 80.8 vs 80.6. Jock Cameron leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Kim Barnett leads on Longevity, Statistics.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CameronWinner
80.8

Cameron wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Barnett
80.6

Barnett wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jock-cameron-vs-kim-barnett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Jock Cameron
80.8

Cameron leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Jock Cameron
80.8
2. Kim Barnett
80.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Kim Barnett5 years played · career day 2,1916,200 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Jock Cameron5 years played · career day 1,826286 runs
-95.4% vs Barnett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇿🇦 Cameron004596216626
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnett0009004,70010,750

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricCameronRetiredBarnettRetired
Test dismissals51—
Test runs1,239—
Runs in one over30—
First-class runs5,39628,593
Tests played264
First-class centuries—61
Seasons played—26
List A runs—12,016
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%9084
Longevity w20%7694
Honours w20%7666
Statistics w15%8692

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Cameron80.8
Barnett80.6
The people
Cameron
Barnett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Cameron or Barnett?

Jock Cameron leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.6 for Kim Barnett — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Barnett beat Cameron?

Barnett scores higher on statistics, longevity. Cameron leads on peak, dominance, honours.

How is the Cameron vs Barnett score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cameron: 80.8, Barnett: 80.6.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cameron vs Barnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →