Who is better, Cameron or Burge?
Peter Burge leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.8 for Jock Cameron — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cameron vs Burge
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Peter Burge above Jock Cameron: 80.9 vs 80.8. Peter Burge leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jock Cameron leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BurgeWinner
80.9Burge wins: Longevity, Statistics
Cameron
80.8Cameron wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/jock-cameron-vs-peter-burge
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Peter Burge
80.9
Burge leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Peter Burge
2. Jock Cameron
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Peter Burge5 years played · career day 2,9211,050 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Jock Cameron5 years played · career day 1,826286 runs
-72.8% vs Burge at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Cameron | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 216 | 626 |
| 🇦🇺 Burge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 1,310 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Burge80.9
Cameron80.8
FAQ
Where does Cameron beat Burge?
Cameron scores higher on dominance, honours. Burge leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Cameron vs Burge score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cameron: 80.8, Burge: 80.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cameron vs Burge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.