GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Choynski vs Hamed

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HamedWinner
83.8

Hamed wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Choynski
83.7

Choynski wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/joe-choynski-vs-naseem-hamed

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Naseem Hamed
83.8

Hamed leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Featherweight champion with fifteen title defences and spectacular knockout power.

1. Naseem Hamed
83.8
2. Joe Choynski
83.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Naseem Hamed5 years played · career day 1,826312 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Joe Choynski5 years played · career day 1,826289 title wins
-7.4% vs Hamed at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Choynski004596218635
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Hamed004599232641

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChoynskiRetiredHamedRetired
Career wins50
Knockouts2531
Career bouts79
Wins over world champions2
Seasons active17
Title defences15
Professional wins36
Professional losses1
World title reign in years6
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%8270
Honours w20%7684
Statistics w15%8888

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hamed83.8
Choynski83.7
The people
Choynski
Hamed

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Choynski vs Hamed. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →