Who is better, Mullen or Eliáš?
Joe Mullen leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Patrik Eliáš — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mullen vs Eliáš
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Joe Mullen and Patrik Eliáš level at 83.4. Joe Mullen leads on Peak, Honours. Patrik Eliáš leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MullenWinner
83.4Mullen wins: Peak, Honours
Eliáš
83.4Eliáš wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/joe-mullen-vs-patrik-elias
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Joe Mullen
83.4
Mullen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Joe Mullen
2. Patrik Eliáš
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Joe Mullen5 seasons played · career day 1,825306 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇿 Patrik Eliáš5 seasons played · career day 2,921284 points
-7.2% vs Mullen at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Mullen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 306 | 650 |
| 🇨🇿 Eliáš | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 341 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Mullen83.4
Eliáš83.4
FAQ
Where does Eliáš beat Mullen?
Eliáš scores higher on longevity. Mullen leads on peak, honours.
How is the Mullen vs Eliáš score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mullen: 83.4, Eliáš: 83.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mullen vs Eliáš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.