GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Root vs Mandhana

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MandhanaWinner
84.8

Mandhana wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Root
83.9

Root wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/joe-root-vs-smriti-mandhana

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana
84.8

Mandhana leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. India's leading opener and a multiple ICC Cricketer of the Year.

1. Smriti Mandhana
84.8
2. Joe Root
83.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Joe Root5 years played · career day 1,8265,063 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana5 years played · career day 2,190228 runs
-95.5% vs Root at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Root001861,1233,5869,511
🇮🇳 Mandhana00030168400

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRootActiveMandhanaActive
Test runs13,000
Test centuries37
Test matches155
ODI runs6,5004,000
Test batting average50.8
ODI centuries10
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards2
T20I runs3,500
Career-high ODI ranking1
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%8476
Honours w20%7682
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mandhana84.8
Root83.9
The people
Root
Mandhana

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Root vs Mandhana. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →