GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Archer vs Brown

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BrownWinner
83.9

Brown wins: Longevity, Statistics

Archer
83.8

Archer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jofra-archer-vs-jack-brown-cricket

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jack Brown
83.9

Brown leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Scored a match-winning 140 in the 1894-95 Ashes decider.

1. Jack Brown
83.9
2. Jofra Archer
83.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Jofra Archer5 years played · career day 1,826382 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jack Brown5 years played · career day 1,825286 runs
-25.1% vs Archer at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Archer0050115292684
🇬🇧 Brown004596286626

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricArcherActiveBrownRetired
World Cup titles1
World Cup wickets in 201920
Test wickets50
Twenty20 international wickets40
Fastest delivery recorded in km/h154
Test runs470
Test centuries1
First-class runs17,920
First-class centuries29
Record opening stand554
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7282
Honours w20%8678
Statistics w15%8690

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Brown83.9
Archer83.8
The people
Archer
Brown

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Archer vs Brown. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →