GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Archer vs Mashrafe

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ArcherWinner
83.8

Archer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Mashrafe
83.7

Mashrafe wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/jofra-archer-vs-mashrafe-mortaza

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jofra Archer
83.8

Archer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Bowled the super over that won England the 2019 World Cup.

1. Jofra Archer
83.8
2. Mashrafe Mortaza
83.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Jofra Archer5 years played · career day 1,826382 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇩 Mashrafe Mortaza5 years played · career day 2,190114 runs
-70.2% vs Archer at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Archer0050115292684
🇧🇩 Mashrafe0001282216

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricArcherActiveMashrafeRetired
World Cup titles1
World Cup wickets in 201920
Test wickets5078
Twenty20 international wickets40
Fastest delivery recorded in km/h154
ODI wickets270
ODI wins as captain50
ODI matches220
International seasons19
Dominance w25%8278
Peak w20%9488
Longevity w20%7288
Honours w20%8676
Statistics w15%8692

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Archer83.8
Mashrafe83.7
The people
Archer
Mashrafe

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Archer vs Mashrafe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →