Who is better, Archer or Mashrafe?
Jofra Archer leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mashrafe Mortaza — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jofra Archer above Mashrafe Mortaza: 83.8 vs 83.7. Jofra Archer leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Mashrafe Mortaza leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Archer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Mashrafe wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jofra-archer-vs-mashrafe-mortaza
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Archer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Archer | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 292 | 684 |
| 🇧🇩 Mashrafe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 82 | 216 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArcherActive · Rajasthan Royals | MashrafeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| World Cup wickets in 2019 | 20 | — |
| Test wickets | 50 | 78 |
| Twenty20 international wickets | 40 | — |
| Fastest delivery recorded in km/h | 154 | — |
| ODI wickets | — | 270 |
| ODI wins as captain | — | 50 |
| ODI matches | — | 220 |
| International seasons | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Jofra Archer leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mashrafe Mortaza — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mashrafe scores higher on statistics, longevity. Archer leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Archer: 83.8, Mashrafe: 83.7.
Make your case for Archer vs Mashrafe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.