Who is better, Childs or Cuttell?
John Childs leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.5 for Willis Cuttell — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Childs vs Cuttell
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks John Childs above Willis Cuttell: 77.8 vs 77.5. John Childs leads on Longevity. Willis Cuttell leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChildsWinner
77.8Childs wins: Longevity
Cuttell
77.5Cuttell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/john-childs-vs-willis-cuttell
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 John Childs
77.8
Childs leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. John Childs
2. Willis Cuttell
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Willis Cuttell5 years played · career day 4,016520 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 John Childs5 years played · career day 1,825235 runs
-54.8% vs Cuttell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Childs | 0 | 0 | 20 | 55 | 235 | 505 |
| 🇬🇧 Cuttell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Childs77.8
Cuttell77.5
FAQ
Where does Cuttell beat Childs?
Cuttell scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Childs leads on longevity.
How is the Childs vs Cuttell score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Childs: 77.8, Cuttell: 77.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Childs vs Cuttell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.