Who is better, Clarkson or Brown?
John Clarkson leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Ray Brown — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores John Clarkson and Ray Brown level at 88.1. John Clarkson leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Ray Brown leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Clarkson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Brown wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/john-clarkson-vs-ray-brown-baseball
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Clarkson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Clarkson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 245 |
| 🇺🇸 Brown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 96 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ClarksonRetired | BrownRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 328 | — |
| Best season wins | 53 | — |
| Career strikeouts | 1,978 | — |
| Career ERA | 2.81 | — |
| Career complete games | 485 | — |
| Negro League pennants | — | 9 |
| Negro World Series titles | — | 2 |
| Career winning percentage | — | 0.72 |
| East-West All-Star selections | — | 3 |
| Seasons played | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
John Clarkson leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Ray Brown — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brown scores higher on honours, longevity. Clarkson leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Clarkson: 88.1, Brown: 88.1.
Make your case for Clarkson vs Brown. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.