Who is better, Devitt or Atherton?
Minna Atherton leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for John Devitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Minna Atherton above John Devitt: 78.5 vs 78.4. Minna Atherton leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. John Devitt leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Atherton wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Devitt wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/john-devitt-vs-minna-atherton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Atherton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Devitt | 0 | 0 | 64 | 146 | 410 | 506 |
| 🇦🇺 Atherton | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DevittRetired | AthertonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 2 | — |
| Short-course world records | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| World junior titles | — | 2 |
| ISL titles | — | 1 |
| 100 m backstroke short-course best | — | 54.89 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 88 |
Minna Atherton leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for John Devitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Devitt scores higher on dominance, honours. Atherton leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Devitt: 78.4, Atherton: 78.5.
Make your case for Devitt vs Atherton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.