Who is better, Devitt or Gibson?
Sarah Gibson leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for John Devitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sarah Gibson above John Devitt: 78.5 vs 78.4. Sarah Gibson leads on Longevity, Statistics. John Devitt leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gibson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Devitt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/john-devitt-vs-sarah-gibson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gibson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Devitt | 0 | 0 | 64 | 146 | 410 | 506 |
| 🇺🇸 Gibson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 356 | 485 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DevittRetired | GibsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 1 |
| US national medals | — | 4 |
| World University Games medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in the 100 fly | — | 5,722 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Sarah Gibson leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.4 for John Devitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Devitt scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Gibson leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Devitt: 78.4, Gibson: 78.5.
Make your case for Devitt vs Gibson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.