GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hartley vs Mandlíková

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HartleyWinner
81.6

Hartley wins: Peak, Statistics

Mandlíková
81.5

Mandlíková wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/john-hartley-vs-hana-mandlikova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 John Hartley
81.6

Hartley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The only clergyman to win Wimbledon, taking the title in 1879 and 1880.

1. John Hartley
81.6
2. Hana Mandlíková
81.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇬🇧 John Hartley5 seasons played · career day 1,82514 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇿 Hana Mandlíková5 seasons played · career day 2,19014 titles
0.0% vs Hartley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Hartley00451435
🇨🇿 Mandlíková00021224

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHartleyRetiredMandlíkováRetired
Wimbledon titles2
Wimbledon finals3
Consecutive titles2
Career years13
Wimbledon appearances6
Grand Slam singles titles4
WTA titles27
Career-high ranking3
Fed Cup titles3
Grand Slam finals11
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%7474
Honours w20%8084
Statistics w15%8682

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hartley81.6
Mandlíková81.5
The people
Hartley
Mandlíková

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hartley vs Mandlíková. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →