GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hartley vs O'Hara Wood

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
O'Hara WoodWinner
81.9

O'Hara Wood wins: Longevity

Hartley
81.6

Hartley wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/john-hartley-vs-pat-ohara-wood

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Pat O'Hara Wood
81.9

O'Hara Wood leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time Australasian champion and a Davis Cup winner.

1. Pat O'Hara Wood
81.9
2. John Hartley
81.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Pat O'Hara Wood5 seasons played · career day 2,19118 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 John Hartley5 seasons played · career day 1,82514 titles
-22.2% vs O'Hara Wood at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Hartley00451435
🇦🇺 O'Hara Wood00081327

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHartleyRetiredO'Hara WoodRetired
Wimbledon titles2
Wimbledon finals3
Consecutive titles2
Career years1315
Wimbledon appearances6
Grand Slam singles titles2
Grand Slam doubles titles5
Davis Cup titles1
Wimbledon doubles titles1
Dominance w25%7876
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%7480
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
O'Hara Wood81.9
Hartley81.6
The people
Hartley
O'Hara Wood

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hartley vs O'Hara Wood. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →