Who is better, Havlicek or Belov?
John Havlicek leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.4 for Sergei Belov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks John Havlicek above Sergei Belov: 90.5 vs 90.4. John Havlicek leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Sergei Belov leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Havlicek wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Belov wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/john-havlicek-vs-sergei-belov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Havlicek leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Havlicek | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 326 | 680 |
| 🇷🇺 Belov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 236 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HavlicekRetired | BelovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 8 | — |
| Career points | 26,395 | — |
| All-Star selections | 13 | — |
| Finals MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Defensive selections | 8 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| EuroBasket titles | — | 4 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 11 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
John Havlicek leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.4 for Sergei Belov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Belov scores higher on peak, dominance. Havlicek leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Havlicek: 90.5, Belov: 90.4.
Make your case for Havlicek vs Belov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.