GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mackey vs Friedman

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MackeyWinner
86.3

Mackey wins: Longevity

Friedman
86.3

Friedman wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/john-mackey-vs-benny-friedman

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 John Mackey
86.3

Mackey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Redefined the tight end position and won Super Bowl V.

1. John Mackey
86.3
2. Benny Friedman
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Benny Friedman5 seasons played · career day 1,825388 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 John Mackey5 seasons played · career day 1,825368 touchdowns
-5.2% vs Friedman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Mackey0050112368632
🇺🇸 Friedman0055131388542

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMackeyRetiredFriedmanRetired
Super Bowl titles1
Pro Bowls5
Career receptions331
Receiving yards5,236
Yards per catch16
NFL titles1
Passing touchdown titles4
Touchdown passes in 192920
All-Pro selections4
Seasons played8
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9494
Longevity w20%7874
Honours w20%8686
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mackey86.3
Friedman86.3
The people
Mackey
Friedman

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mackey vs Friedman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →