GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mackey vs Campbell

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MackeyWinner
86.3

Mackey wins: Longevity

Campbell
86.3

Campbell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/john-mackey-vs-earl-campbell

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 John Mackey
86.3

Mackey leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. Redefined the tight end position and won Super Bowl V.

1. John Mackey
86.3
2. Earl Campbell
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Earl Campbell5 seasons played · career day 1,825382 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 John Mackey5 seasons played · career day 1,825368 touchdowns
-3.7% vs Campbell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Mackey0050112368632
🇺🇸 Campbell0060159382494

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMackeyRetiredCampbellRetired
Super Bowl titles1
Pro Bowls55
Career receptions331
Receiving yards5,236
Yards per catch16
Rushing titles3
NFL MVP awards1
Rushing yards9,407
Offensive Rookie of the Year awards1
Dominance w25%8690
Peak w20%9496
Longevity w20%7866
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mackey86.3
Campbell86.3
The people
Mackey
Campbell

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mackey vs Campbell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →