Who is better, Riggins or Motley?
John Riggins leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for Marion Motley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores John Riggins and Marion Motley level at 87.1. John Riggins leads on Longevity, Statistics. Marion Motley leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Riggins wins: Longevity, Statistics
Motley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/john-riggins-vs-marion-motley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Riggins leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Riggins | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 272 | 572 |
| 🇺🇸 Motley | 0 | 0 | 55 | 124 | 392 | 648 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RigginsRetired | MotleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | — |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Career rushing yards | 11,352 | — |
| Rushing touchdowns | 104 | — |
| Touchdowns in 1983 | 24 | — |
| League titles | — | 5 |
| Yards per carry | — | 6 |
| Rushing yards | — | 4,712 |
| All-league selections | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
John Riggins leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for Marion Motley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Motley scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Riggins leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Riggins: 87.1, Motley: 87.1.
Make your case for Riggins vs Motley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.