Who is better, Douglas or Mushfiqur?
Johnny Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Mushfiqur Rahim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Johnny Douglas above Mushfiqur Rahim: 85.3 vs 85.2. Johnny Douglas leads on Honours, Dominance. Mushfiqur Rahim leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Douglas wins: Dominance, Honours
Mushfiqur wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/johnny-douglas-vs-mushfiqur-rahim
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Douglas leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Douglas | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 582 |
| 🇧🇩 Mushfiqur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 116 | 316 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DouglasRetired | MushfiqurActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic boxing gold medals | 1 | — |
| Tests as captain | 18 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,893 | — |
| First-class runs | 24,531 | — |
| Test wickets | 45 | — |
| Test runs | — | 5,900 |
| ODI runs | — | 7,795 |
| Test double centuries | — | 3 |
| ODI matches | — | 274 |
| International seasons | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 94 |
Johnny Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Mushfiqur Rahim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mushfiqur scores higher on statistics, longevity. Douglas leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Douglas: 85.3, Mushfiqur: 85.2.
Make your case for Douglas vs Mushfiqur. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.