Who is better, Agnew or Dawson?
Jonathan Agnew leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 74.9 for Liam Dawson — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jonathan Agnew above Liam Dawson: 76.5 vs 74.9. Jonathan Agnew leads on Honours, Dominance. Liam Dawson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Agnew wins: Dominance, Honours
Dawson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jonathan-agnew-vs-liam-dawson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Agnew leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Agnew | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 298 | 622 |
| 🏴 Dawson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 128 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AgnewRetired | DawsonActive |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 666 | 450 |
| Test matches | 3 | — |
| One-day internationals | 3 | — |
| First-class matches | 218 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 35 | — |
| First-class runs | — | 9,000 |
| Tests played | — | 8 |
| T20 internationals | — | 20 |
| County Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Jonathan Agnew leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 74.9 for Liam Dawson — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dawson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Agnew leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Agnew: 76.5, Dawson: 74.9.
Make your case for Agnew vs Dawson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.