Who is better, Agnew or Cuttell?
Willis Cuttell leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 76.5 for Jonathan Agnew — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willis Cuttell above Jonathan Agnew: 77.5 vs 76.5. Willis Cuttell leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics. Jonathan Agnew leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cuttell wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Agnew wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/jonathan-agnew-vs-willis-cuttell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cuttell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Agnew | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 298 | 622 |
| 🇬🇧 Cuttell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AgnewRetired | CuttellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 666 | 1,013 |
| Test matches | 3 | — |
| One-day internationals | 3 | — |
| First-class matches | 218 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 35 | — |
| Tests played | — | 2 |
| First-class runs | — | 8,562 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Career years | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Willis Cuttell leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 76.5 for Jonathan Agnew — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Agnew scores higher on dominance. Cuttell leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Agnew: 76.5, Cuttell: 77.5.
Make your case for Agnew vs Cuttell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.