GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Joo vs Yang

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JooWinner
81.8

Joo wins: Longevity

Yang
81.5

Yang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/joo-sae-hyuk-vs-yang-ying-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Joo Sae-hyuk
81.8

Joo leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship singles finalist in 2003 and the finest modern defender.

1. Joo Sae-hyuk
81.8
2. Yang Ying
81.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇰🇷 Joo Sae-hyuk5 seasons played · career day 1,825330 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Yang Ying5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 titles
-1.2% vs Joo at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇰🇷 Joo0050108330684
🇨🇳 Yang0052111326657

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricJooRetiredYangRetired
World Championship medals2
Olympic medals1
Asian Games golds1
Career high world ranking4
Years at the top level22
World Championship titles2
World Cup team titles1
ITTF Pro Tour titles6
Career world ranking best3
Asian medals3
Dominance w25%7680
Peak w20%8688
Longevity w20%8876
Honours w20%8082
Statistics w15%8082

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Joo81.8
Yang81.5
The people
Joo
Yang

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Joo vs Yang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →